Friday, June 12, 2015

"Sapiens: A Brief History of Mankind"

**I read many books. Most of them are for enjoyment, or to pass the time during exercise. Some of them change my perspective enough to afford me new directions to explore. Such is Yuval Noah Hariri's "Sapiens." One thing it made realize more deeply is the ability of religious belief to mitigate suffering. I've always contended that religion is a kind of mind-altering drug that induces calm and hope despite external conditions. Hariri shows how this had an evolutionary role. A peasant in the Middle Ages might live a miserable daily life but was probably happier than today's skeptic, cynic or atheist. I know this from personal experience. I wrote a song, Bone on Bone, that suggests the pain of living without the buffer of spiritual illusions. There are plenty of other anesthetics, of course, and I have availed myself of them. Still, I can't say that I'm happier overall. Life is still hard. I came away wanting to look into Sam Harris's work a little more. Harris was one of the first "Four Horsemen" who eased me out of religion and spirituality. He's since developed along different lines from the other Horsemen and he may have something to say to me.

Hariri writes (or is translated) beautifully and I took copious notes as I read on my iPad with the Kindle app. I share below those highlights in hopes they might coax someone else into reading it and sharing ideas about it.

Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind by Yuval Noah Harari
You have 61 highlighted passages
You have 0 notes
Last annotated on June 12, 2015
Our language evolved as a way of gossiping.Read more at location 389
This ability to speak about fictions is the most unique feature of Sapiens language.Read more at location 415
Sociological research has shown that the maximum ‘natural’ size of a group bonded by gossip is about 150 individuals.Read more at location 452
How did Homo sapiens manage to cross this critical threshold, eventually founding cities comprising tens of thousands of inhabitants and empires ruling hundreds of millions? The secret was probably the appearance of fiction. Large numbers of strangers can cooperate successfully by believing in common myths.Read more at location 462
There are no gods in the universe, no nations, no money, no human rights, no laws, and no justice outside the common imagination of human beings.Read more at location 472
As time went by, the imagined reality became ever more powerful, so that today the very survival of rivers, trees and lions depends on the grace of imagined entities such as the United States and Google.Read more at location 548
The real difference between us and chimpanzees is the mythical glue that binds together large numbers of individuals, families and groups. This glue has made us the masters of creation.Read more at location 645
Albert Einstein was far less dexterous with his hands than was an ancient hunter-gatherer. However, our capacity to cooperate with large numbers of strangers has improved dramatically.Read more at location 649
We hardly notice how ubiquitous our stuff is until we have to move it to a new house.Read more at location 723
Ever since the Cognitive Revolution, there hasn’t been a single natural way of life for Sapiens. There are only cultural choices, from among a bewildering palette of possibilities.Read more at location 760
Before the Agricultural Revolution, the human population of the entire planet was smaller than that of today’s Cairo.Read more at location 786
The Agricultural Revolution was history’s biggest fraud.2 Who was responsible? Neither kings, nor priests, nor merchants. The culprits were a handful of plant species, including wheat, rice and potatoes. These plants domesticated Homo sapiens, rather than vice versa.Read more at location 1273
One of history’s few iron laws is that luxuries tend to become necessities and to spawn new obligations.Read more at location 1403
We believe in a particular order not because it is objectively true, but because believing in it enables us to cooperate effectively and forge a better society.Read more at location 1756
A single priest often does the work of a hundred soldiers – far more cheaply and effectively.Read more at location 1776
Friends giving advice often tell each other, ‘Follow your heart.’ But the heart is a double agent that usually takes its instructions from the dominant myths of the day, and the very recommendation to ‘Follow your heart’ was implanted in our minds by a combination of nineteenth-century Romantic myths and twentieth-century consumerist myths.Read more at location 1829
in order to change an existing imagined order, we must first believe in an alternative imagined order.Read more at location 1886
There is no way out of the imagined order. When we break down our prison walls and run towards freedom, we are in fact running into the more spacious exercise yard of a bigger prison.Read more at location 1890
Hives can be very complex social structures, containing many different kinds of workers, such as harvesters, nurses and cleaners. But so far researchers have failed to locate lawyer bees.Read more at location 1907
musical notation, are partial scripts.Read more at location 1981
how did humans organise themselves in mass-cooperation networks, when they lacked the biological instincts necessary to sustain such networks? The short answer is that humans created imagined orders and devised scripts.Read more at location 2102
Yet it is an iron rule of history that every imagined hierarchy disavows its fictional origins and claims to be natural and inevitable.Read more at location 2121
Whatever is possible is by definition also natural.Read more at location 2331
But evolution has no purpose. Organs have not evolved with a purpose, and the way they are used is in constant flux. There is not a single organ in the human body that only does the job its prototype did when it first appeared hundreds of millions of years ago.Read more at location 2337
Gender is a race in which some of the runners compete only for the bronze medal.Read more at location 2395
Equality can be ensured only by curtailing the freedoms of those who are better off.Read more at location 2540
From such a vantage point it becomes crystal clear that history is moving relentlessly towards unity.Read more at location 2574
We begin with the story of the greatest conqueror in history, a conqueror possessed of extreme tolerance and adaptability, thereby turning people into ardent disciples. This conqueror is money.Read more at location 2666
People who do not believe in the same god or obey the same king are more than willing to use the same money.Read more at location 2667
The sum total of money in the world is about $60 trillion, yet the sum total of coins and banknotes is less than $6 trillion.7 More than 90 per cent of all money – more than $50 trillion appearing in our accounts – exists only on computer servers.Read more at location 2754
everyone always wants money.Read more at location 2761
The truth is that empire has been the world’s most common form of political organisation for the last 2,500 years.Read more at location 2975
Much of ancient mythology is in fact a legal contract in which humans promise everlasting devotion to the gods in exchange for mastery over plants and animals – the first chapters of the book of Genesis are a prime example.Read more at location 3269
But once kingdoms and trade networks expanded, people needed to contact entities whose power and authority encompassed a whole kingdom or an entire trade basin.Read more at location 3275
Polytheism thereby exalted not only the status of the gods, but also that of humankind.Read more at location 3288
Polytheism is inherently open-minded, and rarely persecutes ‘heretics’ and ‘infidels’.Read more at location 3316
it turns out that in these three centuries, the polytheistic Romans killed no more than a few thousand Christians.1 In contrast, over the course of the next 1,500 years, Christians slaughtered Christians by the millions to defend slightly different interpretations of the religion of love and compassion. The religious wars betweenRead more at location 3329
religion that recognises the legitimacy of other faiths implies either that its god is not the supreme power of the universe, or that it received from God just part of the universal truth. Since monotheists have usually believed that they are in possession of the entire message of the one and only God, they have been compelled to discredit all other religions. Over the last two millennia, monotheists repeatedly tried to strengthen their hand by violently exterminating all competition.Read more at location 3368
So, monotheism explains order, but is mystified by evil. Dualism explains evil, but is puzzled by order. There is one logical way of solving the riddle: to argue that there is a single omnipotent God who created the entire universe – and He’s evil. But nobody in history has had the stomach for such a belief.Read more at location 3417
Revolutions are, by definition, unpredictable. A predictable revolution never erupts.Read more at location 3713
history’s choices are not made for the benefit of humans.Read more at location 3728
There is absolutely no proof that human well-being inevitably improves as history rolls along.Read more at location 3729
What enables banks – and the entire economy – to survive and flourish is our trust in the future.Read more at location 4756
This trust is the sole backing for most of the money in the world.Read more at location 4757
Nobody wants to pay taxes, but everyone is happy to invest.Read more at location 4900
The most important economic resource is trust in the future,Read more at location 5101
Some religions, such as Christianity and Nazism, have killed millions out of burning hatred. Capitalism has killed millions out of cold indifference coupled with greed.Read more at location 5143
For decades, aluminium was much more expensive than gold. In the 1860s, Emperor Napoleon III of France commissioned aluminium cutlery to be laid out for his most distinguished guests. Less important visitors had to make do with the gold knives and forks.Read more at location 5284
If I bake a cake from flour, oil and sugar, all of which have been sitting in my pantry for the past two months, it does not mean that the cake itself is two months old.Read more at location 5653
The decline of violence is due largely to the rise of the state. ThroughoutRead more at location 5708
Real peace is the implausibility of war.Read more at location 5769
Never before has peace been so prevalent that people could not even imagine war.Read more at location 5783
Family and community seem to have more impact on our happiness than money and health.Read more at location 5933
People with strong families who live in tight-knit and supportive communities are significantly happier than people whose families are dysfunctional and who have never found (or never sought) a community to be part of.Read more at location 5934
People are made happy by one thing and one thing only – pleasant sensations in their bodies.Read more at location 5999
If we accept the biological approach to happiness, then history turns out to be of minor importance, since most historical events have had no impact on our biochemistry.Read more at location 6039
Today, when we finally realise that the keys to happiness are in the hands of our biochemical system, we can stop wasting our time on politics and social reforms, putsches and ideologies, and focus instead on the only thing that can make us truly happy: manipulating our biochemistry.Read more at location 6058
As Nietzsche put it, if you have a why to live, you can bear almost any how.Read more at location 6083
So our medieval ancestors were happy because they found meaning to life in collective delusions about the afterlife? Yes.Read more at location 6091
What happens to concepts such as the self and gender identity when minds become collective?Read more at location 6354

Whereas we and the Neanderthals are at least human, our inheritors will be godlike.Read more at location 6417

Thursday, June 04, 2015

2020 vision

**Just heard today about a friend near my age who just had a stroke. Two strokes, actually. They say he’s doing well and will make a good comeback. Happy for that. But it got me thinking about why I am so careful about my health these days. Since I’ve had so many health issues (probably a million dollars worth of treatments), why am I still trying to live a “healthy” lifestyle at age 74? My friend has undoubtedly come across and practiced all the tips and tricks of a “healthy lifestyle.”I know he golfs a lot so he’s getting some exercise. He lives in a community that encourages lots of social interaction  And he’s not obese, but not scrawny either. So he’s been cautious and hopeful as he enters this final phase of life.

So why did he have a stroke, and perhaps start the slide into death in the foreseeable future? Why haven’t I had a stroke? How come I don’t have the diabetes that my two brothers have? How come I had heart issues ten or more years after they had theirs? You could say it’s probably genetic — I got  better genes than my siblings. Maybe the spurts of “healthy living” that I’ve engaged in for the past twenty or thirty hears had something to do with it. However, that doesn’t’t account for the years of “unhealthy” living that went on in the same time frame. I’m sure if you dig deep enough into the evidence there’s some logical reason, even other than genetics. My point is that my friend is in my age bracket. By actuarial tables, neither of us will be alive in 2020. So what’s the point, at this point, of living “healthy?” I’m inclined to think that at this age it’s more important to enjoy life even if it means violating some of the rules of healthy living. This is not an attitude I’d recommend for younger people, between 60 an 70. You should probably take care of yourself so that by the time you get to my age you might have a year or two or three more to live. Your friends and family will appreciate it, but it wouldn’t make much difference if you disappeared from their lives a year or two or three earlier. It’d be the same hassle, the same disappointment, the same sadness. Just earlier. There’d be stuff we didn’t get to do in any case.

Tonight I asked: what we’re having for dinner? I was told, how about a nice salad? I said “boring.” All I really want is a bowl of pasta with some butter and garlic and chives along with some parmesan cheese and a couple of glasses of red wine. I’d be happy, and full and probably nowhere nearer death. I’ll probably not get it, but it at least the option lets me contemplate the question: what’s the point at this age? Maybe this should be the age of “wine, women and song?” (We’ll, maybe not so much the women, since nature has pretty much killed that option, although feminine company is always a treat for other reasons than sex.)

Prior to my big geographic move, I had kept alive by striving for a creative goal. Last fall that was pretty much complete. And so did the job that afforded me a modicum of “community” to keep me in the present moment and not contemplating the bleakness of the future. As I do these days.

What has provided me incentives and vitality in the past has been engagement with younger people, whether in Sunday School (feh) or just plain jamming in the living room. But I don’t have that now, and probably won’t have it in the future unless the grandkids suddenly realize that I’m worthy of their attention.

If I can survive until 2020 by having fun with kids and grandkids and the rare friend, I think my life will have been worthwhile.

The only effective atonement

**Harry Cook has done it again: expressed my long-ago realization that Easter is a big fat lie. His latest essay, "The Season of Blood,"

I thought Christian Scientists had a way around the obvious irrationality about which Harry speaks. That version involves a mind-meld with a deity, expressed by the play on words: at-ONE-ment. To be "at one" with a god is to have the same qualities as the god, rendering all our human troubles and limitations meaningless. And the best part is to realize that you are ALREADY one with that deity —  and here's the Easter part —  because Jesus already "proved" that he, a human," was godlike enough not to stay dead. And so the point is actually moot. Of course, the only way to accomplish that is to bend reason completely out of shape and to engage in la-la-la about the very real problems that make life so difficult. All religions play some form of this mind game but Christian Scientists, especially the most "devout," are the best at it, and therefore worse at human interactions with "nons."

I am moving on

** I know its been a long time since I put anything here but I've been busy changing my life all over again, again. In In October I quit my job at Apple after exactly seven years of service. That job had been a lifesaver for me, rescuing me from the doldrums of a forced retirement after being booted out of my comfy job at the headquarters the Christian Science church in Boston. It took a couple of years to get over the anger at being ousted by an ultra conservative faction that wanted to return the church to the silent good old days, a place that my tenure there had been designed to overturn. So with the tables turned and a bitterness that surprised even me I set out to establish a new life. Very quickly I found that everything I had previously based on my life on was bogus.

Monday, March 03, 2014

The Hard Board

**BW was one of the most intelligent, well-read and astute thinkers I have ever known. A couple or three years ago he graciously invited me to play Words with Friends on our phones. At first he would win handily, of course. Still, I enjoyed his companionship, virtual and actual, especially when he and his wife got a place nearby in the City. Gradually, after I'd gained some experience, learning much by playing him, the results weren't always so lopsided. In the past year it was getting closer to 50-50.

Too hard

On occasion, he'd explain his low score by stating that this particular game had a hard board, meaning that the tiles he'd drawn were difficult to turn into high-scoring words. It was an acknowledgement that regardless of the innate intelligence or expertise of a player, the game — like life — is subject to the luck of the draw.

The hardest board
Our last game
About a year ago BW's body was dealt a hard board: Cancer. Despite a generally healthful lifestyle and the best medical treatment money could buy, bad genes also had a place at the table. He played all-out to win, with many ups and downs along the way. But the last move of that game was a few days ago, on March 1 (WWF informed me that "It's been 10 days" since we'd exchanged plays). And it's a down

Not an immortalist
One of several books he'd recommended to me, a book I could actually follow, was one he'd recently re-read: Immortality: the Quest to Live Forever and How it Drives Civilization. We discussed and agreed with the conclusion of that book: though there is no way —  here or hereafter —  to gain immortality, the best policy is to live here kindly, seek the welfare of others and be rid of as much illusion as possible. Qualities BW exemplified amply, gently.

While expected and prepared for, his death still pains me. I will miss the companionship of this formidable opponent and virtual/actual friend.

But, wait —  sadly, there's more.
Just a couple hours after being informed of BW's grim prognosis I got this distressing tweet from my former colleague and friend, CG:
She's a brilliant writer, specializing in food. Her restaurant reviews, descriptions of food, travelogues and the like were always fascinating, even if one didn't care for her subject (my favorite is an entry, with video, about dining on a pig's head.) After leaving our religious citadel, where she was employed as a rare "non," she got a job at a cancer hospital.

And then got cancer.

In the mouth.

In the mouth.

Hard board, indeed.

A couple years of chemo, some ups and downs, and now: "end of the line." What makes it more appalling is that she's supposed to be in the prime of life — arguably unlike BW and, certainly, me. She's supposed to get a better deal. Life is supposed to be a lot easier. And longer lasting.

How tweet it isn't
Adding to the weirdness of this experience is the fact that she's sharing her death process ON THE INTERNET! Now, I accept that we're in a connected age, but this is bizarre. Maybe outrageous. Yet, strangely, in her case, it's also inspiring. She can pull it off because her good cheer, humor and eloquence take the edge off.

But beyond the edge is the rest of the blade: She'll be gone soon. Too soon.

Why me?
I don't know if I have better or worse genes than these two hapless friends. If better genes, I'm sure I've compromised their ability to help me. I smoked for twenty years — two+ packs a day and drank heavily during several periods in my life, including the most recent seven years. High salt. High fat. High alcohol. High tension. High risk.

But easier boards:
As I've blogged about before, last October, when an echocardiogram showed that my heart was delivering only a 37% ejection fraction (40%-50% is considered below normal), it was decided that I needed an angiogram to determine the cause and treatment. This involves slipping a very thin tube into a coronary artery (don’t ask how) and taking a look around. What they saw was a vessel 99% blocked by plaque — a sign of hard living, and maybe hard genetics. As I understand my cardiologist's explanation, when this thin tube (catheter) was inserted into that coronary artery it made the blockage go from 99% to 100%. This essentially induced a "heart attack" right there on the cath lab table. Emergency measures ensued and the medical team was able to bring me back and complete the mission. I left the hospital a couple days later with three stents in that artery.  

As boards go, this was "hard." But not "too hard," thanks to medical expertise.

And a stroke of good luck 
It affirms where I stand now: soberly atheistic after decades of believing in, teaching about and advocating for a supreme benevolent force for good in the universe. I am not naïve and unschooled. I've studied the Bible, theology and metaphysics; studied and unsuccessfully practiced an unrealistic 19th century healing system based on that premise; taught it; written about it; and carefully observed my life and the lives of others (including those of my atheist friends BW and CG, as well as my believing family and other friends). I have studied and tried several different belief systems including the no less loony one I was brought up with. 

And my conclusions: We live in a material universe that has originated, evolved and is run by chance. "Spirituality" has more to do with insight into human consciousness than with any tangible substance. In sum: There is no "God."

Why not?
By far a most convincing argument against a theological ground of existence is expressed by the website: Why won't God Heal amputees? It's based on the fact that there has never been a credibly documented case where an amputated limb was restored to normality through "spiritual" means. If a god can't do that, the rest is bullshit. The "goodness" in our experience has nothing to do with any "Principle" of goodness. It's just optimal human practice.

As a blog pal and also former religionist, Liz Heywood, has expressed it: "I'm happier with Chance instead of fate." Well, I wouldn't exactly say I'm happy with chance — I'm not happy with anything that determines my destruction. But it's certainly more intellectually honest and satisfying than believing in an imaginary but impotent Friend.

I'll leave it there for now.

Farewell, precious fellow players. 
Sooner or later I'll be joining you in oblivion, if not renown.

And to my still-playing companions in this perilous and doomed game, for as long as possible, may the boards be with us.